unfortunately this also affects davinci resolve, because we all know, that even the studio version and its h264 codecs simply can not compete with the quality of the well known open source x264. I also hardly understand, why people always want to spend money for tools/tasks, which can be handled by free open source solutions in a much more satisfying way. SkierEvans wrote:I find it amusing that people have cameras and computers that must have cost them lots of money and will not spend $299 on software to make it all work !!! In the 20+ reviews and blog posts I've read about the GH5, I do not recall playback and editing concerns being mentioned. What I wasn't expecting was that playing back and/or editing the GH5's 10-bit 4:2:2 files would be a problem. I'm highly intrigued by the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K, however. And it really is a nice camera that also takes good photos to go with the video. (And yes, I know that the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K is also Micro-FourThirds.) And the GH5 has been shipping for more than a year, so I figure all the bugs are worked out. I have two other Panasonic Micro-FourThirds cameras, so I already have an assortment of lenses for them. I got the GH5 because it was a one-time deep discount: The camera and a nice Panasonic lens together were $1,500. It will cost $1,295 including DaVinci Resolve Studio and will be available later this year: But I wonder why you got the GH5?īack in April Blackmagic announced the Pocket Cinema Camera 4K. I hope you are happy with Andrews very nice answers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |